Skip to main content

A Letter to Hillsdale from 2012

Below is an e-mail that I sent to then director of marketing Bill Gray and to Provost David Whalen on March 10, 2012. They did not reply. I also published it as a note on facebook that was open to Hillsdale College students and alumni, where there was a (generally positive) reaction and a constructive conversation.

Connor Friedersdorf has opened a conversation concerning the tensions between Hillsdale College's advocacy for virtue and the Western Tradition, and its current support for the Trump Administration. I am posting it as a piece of evidence concerning the long-standing tensions between the marketing position of Hillsdale and the actual values inculcated by the college and championed by its alumni. 

--


Dear Bill Gray,

As an alumni (Class of 2007) of Hillsdale College, I was a bit surprised when the College began advertising on Rush Limbaugh's show. Nevertheless, I understood that there are some points of contact between his form of conservatism and the mission of Hillsdale College, which I assumed were the reason for the choice. I became concerned, however, when he demonstrate his complete lack of sympathy for the study of the classics last November. In the aftermath of the scandal related to his comments on Sandra Fluke, however, I felt that I needed to communicate my growing dissatisfaction with these advertisements to the college.

As the official college statement on the matter indicates, these comments were destructive to the public debate on the relationships between church and state and the state sponsorship of healthcare. By stooping to ad hominem attacks, his comments did not present an actual argument against her position and left conservatives crippled in their ability to speak to these issues. His apology was certainly necessary, but as many have noted,* it was far from convincing.

My concern with Hillsdale College advertising on the Rush Limbaugh show is that it will lead people unfamiliar with the college to assume that it actually supports the bombastic and often problematic positions and personal attacks that he articulates on the show. There are already news stories running that indicate Hillsdale's continued support is noticeable given the number of advertisers dropping him. While the college's official statement is good, the majority of listeners to his show, whether regular or not, will never see this statement. Instead, they will naturally assume that the college supports the positions that they hear on the air. Given his pattern of voicing destructive rhetoric, this seems like a considerable liability for the college as it tries to attract good students and encourage the study of the liberal arts.

Additionally, if the only thing that a person knows about Hillsdale College is that it advertises on Rush Limbaugh's program, this could become a liability for alumni. Given the audience of his program, it would not be surprising if this were the case for thousands of employers across the country. Associating their degrees with the inflammatory radio personality is a disservice to the alumni seeking employment in a difficult economy.

For these reasons, I strongly encourage you and the college to reconsider advertising on his program.

Sincerely,
Phillip Fox
Hillsdale College Salutatorian (2007)

* The above link is to a google cache (text-only, I'm afraid) of a post at the Economist's Johnson blog. My old link did not work well and The Economist's website does not seem to have a functional version of the blog up, as far as my browser is concerned.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On the Cost of Voting for the Lesser Evil

Since Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party in the summer of 2016, I have struggled to understand the way in which many evangelicals have responded to his nomination, both during the election and in its aftermath. I grew up among the “Theologically Orphaned Generation” that was steeped in a culture that emphasized the necessity of virtue and moral character for those who would serve the public, both in the church and in politics. That background left me bewildered by the willingness of so many evangelical leaders to support Trump despite acknowledging his lack of virtue. When I have asked evangelical friends and family about their choice to support Trump in the election, I have encountered a consistent response. That answer was summarized well by Os Guinness in an interview with Collin Hansen of Beeson Divinity School during the spring of 2017: Collin Hansen: …what would you say that you learned, perhaps about yourself or about evangelicals, in the ...

The Role of Confusion in Education

What do you do when the world around you stops making sense? This is a question everyone faces at times and we each struggle through it in a variety of ways. From a brief moment of confusion to an enduring existential crisis, encountering disturbing experiences in the world is a part of the human experience. How one handles such moments of disorientation determines the form of the individual's growth, either channeling it in a direction that can assimilate the new experiences, or in a way that suppresses them. As a teacher, creating such moments of disorientation is an essential part of what I do. It is hard to learn when you think you know where everything is going. It is also hard to learn when you don't care about what is happening in front of you. Nothing breaks through apathy like a shocking example that does not fit one's assumptions about the world. A classroom crisis of this sort is usually operating on the margins of one's identity. For example, while tea...

What does it mean to be conservative?

When asked recently by a few different people how I self-identify politically, I struggled. I have a visceral desire to identify as conservative, but I'm not sure that anyone would understand what I mean with the word. Thoughtful conversations and comments regarding my letter to Conor Friedersdorf and other posts have convinced me that trying to work out the meaning of conservative is necessary for effective dialogue. To begin this conversation,  I will consider the origins of the modern conservative movement and what light it sheds on politics in the era of Trump. The modern conservative movement began in reaction to the French Revolution of 1789. It was (and usually remains) reactive, opposing change rather than advocating for it. As such, it has tended to lack a normative description of how the world should be, and instead has generally opposed changes that threaten the order that is. This was the key idea that drove William F. Buckley, Jr. to found the National Review in 195...