Skip to main content

A brief hiatus

I will be taking a brief hiatus from the blog for the next two weeks because of the death of my grandmother last week and the wedding of a sister-in-law this coming weekend. I hope to get back to blogging more regularly the second week of June.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On the Cost of Voting for the Lesser Evil

Since Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee of the Republican Party in the summer of 2016, I have struggled to understand the way in which many evangelicals have responded to his nomination, both during the election and in its aftermath. I grew up among the “Theologically Orphaned Generation” that was steeped in a culture that emphasized the necessity of virtue and moral character for those who would serve the public, both in the church and in politics. That background left me bewildered by the willingness of so many evangelical leaders to support Trump despite acknowledging his lack of virtue. When I have asked evangelical friends and family about their choice to support Trump in the election, I have encountered a consistent response. That answer was summarized well by Os Guinness in an interview with Collin Hansen of Beeson Divinity School during the spring of 2017: Collin Hansen: …what would you say that you learned, perhaps about yourself or about evangelicals, in the ...

What does it mean to be conservative?

When asked recently by a few different people how I self-identify politically, I struggled. I have a visceral desire to identify as conservative, but I'm not sure that anyone would understand what I mean with the word. Thoughtful conversations and comments regarding my letter to Conor Friedersdorf and other posts have convinced me that trying to work out the meaning of conservative is necessary for effective dialogue. To begin this conversation,  I will consider the origins of the modern conservative movement and what light it sheds on politics in the era of Trump. The modern conservative movement began in reaction to the French Revolution of 1789. It was (and usually remains) reactive, opposing change rather than advocating for it. As such, it has tended to lack a normative description of how the world should be, and instead has generally opposed changes that threaten the order that is. This was the key idea that drove William F. Buckley, Jr. to found the National Review in 195...

"Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes": How Loyalty Relativizes Virtue

The release of Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith in 2005 divided conservative fans of the series. I knew many who were frustrated by a conversation between Darth Vader (Hayden Christensen) and Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor). In it, Obi-Wan warns Vader about the path that he is on: OBI-WAN: You have allowed this Dark Lord to twist your mind until now . . . until now you have become the very thing you swore to destroy. ANAKIN: Don't lecture me, Obi-Wan. I see through the lies of the Jedi. I do not fear the dark side as you do. I have brought peace, justice, freedom, and security to my new Empire. OBI-WAN: Your new Empire? ANAKIN: Don't make me kill you. OBI-WAN: Anakin, my allegiance is to the Republic ... to democracy. ANAKIN: If you're not with me, you're my enemy. OBI-WAN: Only a Sith Lord deals in absolutes. I will do what I must. Many objected to Obi-Wan's identification of the Sith with absolutes. I push back on that interpretat...