After Lisa's brief (and accurate!) summary of my post, I realized that there are a few broader issues that I'd like to make clear, too. First of all, this applies to all political participation regardless of the election or party affiliation. All of us are subject to the "follow the leader" effect, and there is evidence that those who are best informed regarding politics are the most susceptible to it. Those who voted for Clinton (or anyone else in the last election) would be subject to the same tendencies to have their views shaped by that person. As I understand Achen and Bartels, however, the much lower visibility of losing candidates gives them much less ability to shape their supporters. So, ironically, voting for the lesser evil is less dangerous if one votes for a losing candidate. So why does this matter? I take from it that the old conservative argument that character matters for holding office is meaningfully vindicated in practice. Which brings me to...